我最近几周一直在使用Vulkan,但遇到了一个问题,只有在AMD显卡上才会出现。具体来说是AMD 7970M。我已经在GTX 700和900系列的显卡上运行过我的项目,并且没有出现任何问题。我甚至在Windows和Linux(Steam OS)上使用Nvidia显卡运行也没有任何问题。问题只在AMD显卡上以及我的项目中出现;所有来自Sascha Willems的示例和项目都能正常运行。
现在我正在绘制一个带纹理的Raptor模型并将其旋转在原地。然后我将其呈现到一个纹理上,再将该纹理应用于全屏三角形;基本上是屏幕外渲染。但是在我的7970M上深度似乎无法正确清除。相反,出现了这种奇怪的伪影,就像深度没有被正确地清除:
当然,我尝试使用RenderDoc进行调试,发现深度完全错误。无论是Raptor还是绘制到上面的全屏三角形都是一团糟:
我尝试将我的代码与Sascha Willems的屏幕外示例进行比较,发现我几乎以相同的方式处理。我认为可能是我创建深度的方式有问题,但与我看到的所有示例相比,它似乎没有问题。
这里是我创建深度图像和视图的一些调试视图:
这是整个方法:
bool VKRenderTarget::setupFramebuffer(VKRenderer* renderer)
{
VkDevice device = renderer->GetVKDevice();
VkCommandBuffer setupCommand;
m_colorFormat = renderer->GetPreferredImageFormat();
m_depthFormat = renderer->GetPreferredDepthFormat();
renderer->CreateSetupCommandBuffer();
setupCommand = renderer->GetSetupCommandBuffer();
VkResult err;
//Color attachment
VkImageCreateInfo imageInfo = {};
imageInfo.sType = VK_STRUCTURE_TYPE_IMAGE_CREATE_INFO;
imageInfo.pNext = nullptr;
imageInfo.format = m_colorFormat;
imageInfo.imageType = VK_IMAGE_TYPE_2D;
imageInfo.extent.width = m_width;
imageInfo.extent.height = m_height;
imageInfo.mipLevels = 1;
imageInfo.arrayLayers = 1;
imageInfo.samples = VK_SAMPLE_COUNT_1_BIT;
imageInfo.tiling = VK_IMAGE_TILING_OPTIMAL;
imageInfo.usage = VK_IMAGE_USAGE_COLOR_ATTACHMENT_BIT | VK_IMAGE_USAGE_TRANSFER_SRC_BIT;
imageInfo.flags = 0;
VkMemoryAllocateInfo memAllocInfo = {};
memAllocInfo.sType = VK_STRUCTURE_TYPE_MEMORY_ALLOCATE_INFO;
VkMemoryRequirements memReqs;
err = vkCreateImage(device, &imageInfo, nullptr, &m_color.image);
assert(!err);
if (err != VK_SUCCESS)
{
#ifdef _DEBUG
Core::DebugPrintF("VKRenderTarget::VPrepare(): Error creating color image!\n");
#endif
return false;
}
vkGetImageMemoryRequirements(device, m_color.image, &memReqs);
memAllocInfo.allocationSize = memReqs.size;
renderer->MemoryTypeFromProperties(memReqs.memoryTypeBits, VK_MEMORY_PROPERTY_DEVICE_LOCAL_BIT, &memAllocInfo.memoryTypeIndex);
err = vkAllocateMemory(device, &memAllocInfo, nullptr, &m_color.memory);
assert(!err);
if (err != VK_SUCCESS)
{
#ifdef _DEBUG
Core::DebugPrintF("VKRenderTarget::VPrepare(): Error allocating color image memory!\n");
#endif
return false;
}
err = vkBindImageMemory(device, m_color.image, m_color.memory, 0);
if (err != VK_SUCCESS)
{
#ifdef _DEBUG
Core::DebugPrintF("VKRenderTarget::VPrepare(): Error binding color image memory!\n");
#endif
return false;
}
renderer->SetImageLayout(setupCommand, m_color.image, VK_IMAGE_ASPECT_COLOR_BIT,
VK_IMAGE_LAYOUT_UNDEFINED, VK_IMAGE_LAYOUT_COLOR_ATTACHMENT_OPTIMAL);
VkImageViewCreateInfo viewInfo = {};
viewInfo.sType = VK_STRUCTURE_TYPE_IMAGE_VIEW_CREATE_INFO;
viewInfo.pNext = nullptr;
viewInfo.viewType = VK_IMAGE_VIEW_TYPE_2D;
viewInfo.format = m_colorFormat;
viewInfo.flags = 0;
viewInfo.subresourceRange = {};
viewInfo.subresourceRange.aspectMask = VK_IMAGE_ASPECT_COLOR_BIT;
viewInfo.subresourceRange.baseMipLevel = 0;
viewInfo.subresourceRange.levelCount = 1;
viewInfo.subresourceRange.baseArrayLayer = 0;
viewInfo.subresourceRange.layerCount = 1;
viewInfo.image = m_color.image;
err = vkCreateImageView(device, &viewInfo, nullptr, &m_color.view);
if (err != VK_SUCCESS)
{
#ifdef _DEBUG
Core::DebugPrintF("VKRenderTarget::VPrepare(): Error creating color image view!\n");
#endif
return false;
}
//We can reuse the same info structs to build the depth image
imageInfo.format = m_depthFormat;
imageInfo.usage = VK_IMAGE_USAGE_DEPTH_STENCIL_ATTACHMENT_BIT;
err = vkCreateImage(device, &imageInfo, nullptr, &(m_depth.image));
assert(!err);
if (err != VK_SUCCESS)
{
#ifdef _DEBUG
Core::DebugPrintF("VKRenderTarget::VPrepare(): Error creating depth image!\n");
#endif
return false;
}
viewInfo.format = m_depthFormat;
viewInfo.subresourceRange.aspectMask = VK_IMAGE_ASPECT_DEPTH_BIT | VK_IMAGE_ASPECT_STENCIL_BIT;
vkGetImageMemoryRequirements(device, m_depth.image, &memReqs);
memAllocInfo.allocationSize = memReqs.size;
renderer->MemoryTypeFromProperties(memReqs.memoryTypeBits, VK_MEMORY_PROPERTY_DEVICE_LOCAL_BIT, &memAllocInfo.memoryTypeIndex);
err = vkAllocateMemory(device, &memAllocInfo, nullptr, &m_depth.memory);
assert(!err);
if (err != VK_SUCCESS)
{
#ifdef _DEBUG
Core::DebugPrintF("VKRenderTarget::VPrepare(): Error allocating depth image memory!\n");
#endif
return false;
}
err = vkBindImageMemory(device, m_depth.image, m_depth.memory, 0);
if (err != VK_SUCCESS)
{
#ifdef _DEBUG
Core::DebugPrintF("VKRenderTarget::VPrepare(): Error binding depth image memory!\n");
#endif
return false;
}
renderer->SetImageLayout(setupCommand, m_depth.image,
VK_IMAGE_ASPECT_DEPTH_BIT | VK_IMAGE_ASPECT_STENCIL_BIT,
VK_IMAGE_LAYOUT_UNDEFINED,
VK_IMAGE_LAYOUT_DEPTH_STENCIL_ATTACHMENT_OPTIMAL);
viewInfo.image = m_depth.image;
err = vkCreateImageView(device, &viewInfo, nullptr, &m_depth.view);
if (err != VK_SUCCESS)
{
#ifdef _DEBUG
Core::DebugPrintF("VKRenderTarget::VPrepare(): Error creating depth image view!\n");
#endif
return false;
}
renderer->FlushSetupCommandBuffer();
//Finally create internal framebuffer
VkImageView attachments[2];
attachments[0] = m_color.view;
attachments[1] = m_depth.view;
VkFramebufferCreateInfo framebufferInfo = {};
framebufferInfo.sType = VK_STRUCTURE_TYPE_FRAMEBUFFER_CREATE_INFO;
framebufferInfo.pNext = nullptr;
framebufferInfo.flags = 0;
framebufferInfo.renderPass = *((VKRenderPass*)m_renderPass)->GetVkRenderPass();
framebufferInfo.attachmentCount = 2;
framebufferInfo.pAttachments = attachments;
framebufferInfo.width = m_width;
framebufferInfo.height = m_height;
framebufferInfo.layers = 1;
err = vkCreateFramebuffer(device, &framebufferInfo, nullptr, &m_framebuffer);
if (err != VK_SUCCESS)
{
#ifdef _DEBUG
Core::DebugPrintF("VKRenderTarget::VPrepare(): Error creating framebuffer!\n");
#endif
return false;
}
return true;
}
如果有人想要了解代码的更多信息,可以随时询问,我会提供。这个项目有很多行代码,所以我不希望每个人都要浏览所有代码。然而,如果您愿意,所有的代码都可以在http://github.com/thirddegree/HatchitGraphics/tree/dev找到。
编辑:经过再次探索,我发现颜色甚至不能正确清除。RenderDoc显示每一帧只渲染了迅猛龙的剪影,并没有清除其他区域的框架。这是驱动程序的问题吗?
编辑:更多信息。我发现如果什么都不画,只是开始和结束渲染,甚至不画全屏三角形,屏幕就会被清除。然而,如果我只画三角形,深度是错误的(即使我不从离屏绘制任何东西或应用任何纹理)。
编辑:更具体地说,颜色将被清除,但深度不会。如果什么都不画,深度将保持黑色;全部为0。为什么全屏三角形会导致深度的奇怪静态我不确定。