var x = 0;
var y = 1;
var z;
fib[0] = 0;
fib[1] = 1;
for (i = 2; i <= 10; i++) {
alert(x + y);
fib[i] = x + y;
x = y;
z = y;
}
我尝试生成一个简单的斐波那契数列,但没有输出。
请问有人能告诉我出了什么问题吗?
var x = 0;
var y = 1;
var z;
fib[0] = 0;
fib[1] = 1;
for (i = 2; i <= 10; i++) {
alert(x + y);
fib[i] = x + y;
x = y;
z = y;
}
我尝试生成一个简单的斐波那契数列,但没有输出。
请问有人能告诉我出了什么问题吗?
我喜欢的是,在JS中创建斐波那契数列的方法有很多种。我会尝试复制其中一些方法。目标是将序列输出到控制台(如{n: 6, fiboNum: 8}
)
// The IIFE form is purposefully omitted. See below.
const fiboGenClosure = () => {
let [a, b] = [0, 1];
let n = 0;
return (fiboNum = a) => {
[a, b] = [b, a + b];
return {
n: n++,
fiboNum: fiboNum
};
};
}
// Gets the sequence until given nth number. Always returns a new copy of the main function, so it is possible to generate multiple independent sequences.
const generateFiboClosure = n => {
const newSequence = fiboGenClosure();
for (let i = 0; i <= n; i++) {
console.log(newSequence());
}
}
generateFiboClosure(21);
与上述闭包模式类似,利用生成器函数和for..of循环的优点。
// The 'n' argument is a substitute for index.
function* fiboGen(n = 0) {
let [a, b] = [0, 1];
while (true) {
yield [a, n++];
[a, b] = [b, a + b];
}
}
// Also gives a new sequence every time is invoked.
const generateFibonacci = n => {
const iterator = fiboGen();
for (let [value, index] of iterator) {
console.log({
n: index,
fiboNum: value
});
if (index >= n) break;
}
}
generateFibonacci(21);
尾调用递归是一个有些棘手的问题,因为即使到了2018年末,尾调用优化仍然是一个问题。但老实说——如果你不使用任何聪明的技巧允许默认的JS引擎使用非常大的数字,它会变得昏头转向,并声称下一个斐波那契数在第1477次迭代时为“无穷大”。栈可能在第10,000次迭代左右溢出(这主要取决于浏览器、内存等等)。可以通过try... catch语句块来缓解,或者检查是否已达到“无穷大”。
const fibonacciRTC = (n, i = 0, a = 0, b = 1) => {
console.log({
n: i,
fibonacci: a
});
if (n === 0) return;
return fibonacciRTC(--n, ++i, b, a + b);
}
fibonacciRTC(21)
如果我们不考虑console.log
,只返回一个数字,它可以被写成一行代码:
const fibonacciRTC2 = (n, a = 0, b = 1) => n === 0 ? a : fibonacciRTC2(n - 1, b, a + b);
console.log(fibonacciRTC2(21))
阅读此mathIsFun文章后,我发现斐波那契数列也适用于负数!我尝试按照上面的递归尾调用形式进行实现:
const fibonacciRTC3 = (n, a = 0, b = 1, sign = n >= 0 ? 1 : -1) => {
if (n === 0) return a * sign;
return fibonacciRTC3(n - sign, b, a + b, sign);
}
console.log(fibonacciRTC3(8)); // 21
console.log(fibonacciRTC3(-8)); // -21
您可以获取一些缓存来加速算法...
var tools = {
fibonacci : function(n) {
var cache = {};
// optional seed cache
cache[2] = 1;
cache[3] = 2;
cache[4] = 3;
cache[5] = 5;
cache[6] = 8;
return execute(n);
function execute(n) {
// special cases 0 or 1
if (n < 2) return n;
var a = n - 1;
var b = n - 2;
if(!cache[a]) cache[a] = execute(a);
if(!cache[b]) cache[b] = execute(b);
return cache[a] + cache[b];
}
}
};
const fib = (n, prev = 0, current = 1) => n
? fib(--n, current, prev + current)
: prev + current
console.log( fib(10) )
ty @geeves for the catch, I replaced Math.floor
for Math.round
which seems to get it up to 76 where floating point issues come into play :/ ...
either way, I wouldn't want to be using recursion up and until that point.
/**
* Binet Fibonacci number formula for determining
* sequence values
* @param {int} pos - the position in sequence to lookup
* @returns {int} the Fibonacci value of sequence @pos
*/
var test = [0,1,1,2,3,5,8,13,21,34,55,89,144,233,377,610,987,1597,2584,4181,6765,10946,17711,28657,46368,75025,121393,196418,317811,514229,832040,1346269,2178309,3524578,5702887,9227465,14930352,24157817,39088169,63245986,102334155,165580141,267914296,433494437,701408733,1134903170,1836311903,2971215073,4807526976,7778742049,12586269025,20365011074,32951280099,53316291173,86267571272,139583862445,225851433717,365435296162,591286729879,956722026041,1548008755920,2504730781961,4052739537881,6557470319842,10610209857723,17167680177565,27777890035288,44945570212853,72723460248141,117669030460994,190392490709135,308061521170129,498454011879264,806515533049393,1304969544928657,2111485077978050,3416454622906707,5527939700884757,8944394323791464,14472334024676221,23416728348467685,37889062373143906,61305790721611591,99194853094755497,160500643816367088,259695496911122585,420196140727489673,679891637638612258,1100087778366101931,1779979416004714189,2880067194370816120,4660046610375530309,7540113804746346429,12200160415121876738,19740274219868223167,31940434634990099905,51680708854858323072,83621143489848422977,135301852344706746049,218922995834555169026];
var fib = function (pos) {
return Math.round((Math.pow( 1 + Math.sqrt(5), pos)
- Math.pow( 1 - Math.sqrt(5), pos))
/ (Math.pow(2, pos) * Math.sqrt(5)));
};
/* This is only for the test */
var max = test.length,
i = 0,
frag = document.createDocumentFragment(),
_div = document.createElement('div'),
_text = document.createTextNode(''),
div,
text,
err,
num;
for ( ; i < max; i++) {
div = _div.cloneNode();
text = _text.cloneNode();
num = fib(i);
if (num !== test[i]) {
err = i + ' == ' + test[i] + '; got ' + num;
div.style.color = 'red';
}
text.nodeValue = i + ': ' + num;
div.appendChild(text);
frag.appendChild(div);
}
document.body.appendChild(frag);
function fibonacci(n) {
let fibList = [];
let [a, b] = [0, 1]; // array destructuring to ease your pain
while (a < n) {
fibList.push(a);
[a, b] = [b, a + b]; // less pain, more gain
}
return fibList;
}
console.log(fibonacci(10)); // prints [0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8]
while (fibList.length < n)
是你要找的(当 n 小于 1 时加上一些安全检查)。因为你的函数不是返回斐波那契数列中的 n 个元素,而是返回小于 n 的未知数量的元素。 - ajax333221对于负整数,也有Binet公式的推广:
static float phi = (1.0f + sqrt(5.0f)) / 2.0f;
int generalized_binet_fib(int n) {
return round( (pow(phi, n) - cos(n * M_PI) * pow(phi, -n)) / sqrt(5.0f) );
}
...
for(int i = -10; i < 10; ++i)
printf("%i ", generalized_binet_fib(i));
另一种实现方式,虽然是递归的,但非常快速,并使用单个内联函数。它在第80个序列(以及所有其他算法)时达到了JavaScript 64位数字精度限制:例如,如果您想要第78个术语(78放在最后一个括号中):
(function (n,i,p,r){p=(p||0)+r||1;i=i?i+1:1;return i<=n?arguments.callee(n,i,r,p):r}(78));
将返回:8944394323791464
这是向后兼容的,一直到 ECMASCRIPT4 - 我已经在 IE7 上测试过了,它可以工作!
不需要慢速循环,生成器或递归函数(有缓存或无缓存)。这里是一个使用Array
和reduce
的快速一行代码。
ECMAScript 6:
var fibonacci=(n)=>Array(n).fill().reduce((a,b,c)=>a.concat(c<2?c:a[c-1]+a[c-2]),[])
ECMAScript 5:
function fibonacci(n){
return Array.apply(null,{length:n}).reduce(function(a,b,c){return a.concat((c<2)?c:a[c-1]+a[c-2]);},[]);
}
在 Windows 10 中使用 Chrome 59 进行测试:
fibonacci(10); // 0 ms -> (10) [0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34]
JavaScript可以处理最大为1476的数字,达到Infinity
之前。
fibonacci(1476); // 11ms -> (1476) [0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, ...]
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<title>fibonacci series</title>
<script type="text/javascript">
function generateseries(){
var fno = document.getElementById("firstno").value;
var sno = document.getElementById("secondno").value;
var a = parseInt(fno);
var result = new Array();
result[0] = a;
var b = ++fno;
var c = b;
while (b <= sno) {
result.push(c);
document.getElementById("maindiv").innerHTML = "Fibonacci Series between "+fno+ " and " +sno+ " is " +result;
c = a + b;
a = b;
b = c;
}
}
function numeric(evt){
var theEvent = evt || window.event;
var key = theEvent.keyCode || theEvent.which;
key = String.fromCharCode(key);
var regex = /[0-9]|\./;
if (!regex.test(key)) {
theEvent.returnValue = false;
if (theEvent.preventDefault)
theEvent.preventDefault();
}
}
</script>
<h1 align="center">Fibonacci Series</h1>
</head>
<body>
<div id="resultdiv" align="center">
<input type="text" name="firstno" id="firstno" onkeypress="numeric(event)"><br>
<input type="text" name="secondno" id="secondno" onkeypress="numeric(event)"><br>
<input type="button" id="result" value="Result" onclick="generateseries();">
<div id="maindiv"></div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
我知道这是一个有点老的问题,但是我意识到这里的许多答案都在使用for循环而不是while循环。
有时候,while循环比for循环更快,所以我想贡献一些在while循环中运行斐波那契数列的代码!使用适合自己需求的任何方法。
function fib(length) {
var fibArr = [],
i = 0,
j = 1;
fibArr.push(i);
fibArr.push(j);
while (fibArr.length <= length) {
fibArr.push(fibArr[j] + fibArr[i]);
j++;
i++;
}
return fibArr;
};
fib(15);
var fib = (n, prev = 0, current = 1) => !n ? prev + current : fib(--n, current, prev+current);
似乎显示的是第n+3个项目而不是第n个项目。将测试更改为!(n-3)即可解决此问题;但是,这意味着fib(0),fib(1)和fib(2)无法正常工作。 - Roger_Sfunction fib(n, prev = 0, current = 1) { if (n > 2) { return fib(--n, current, prev+current); } if (n === 2) { return prev + current; } return n; }
- radzserg