使用Python按顺时针角度排序二维坐标列表?

13

我有一组点,这些点的x和y坐标可以在下面的图中看到。九个点的坐标如下列表所示:

L = [[5,2], [4,1], [3.5,1], [1,2], [2,1], [3,1], [3,3], [4,3] , [2,3]]

这个想法是从一个原点开始按顺时针方向对点进行排序。在这种情况下,原点是被着色并带有指示排序方向箭头的点。不要担心创建确定原点的方法,因为它已经解决。

因此,在排序后,列表L应如下所示:

L = [[2,3], [3,3], [4,3], [5,2], [4,1], [3.5,1], [3,1], [2,1], [1,2]]
请注意,x和y坐标没有改变。改变的是存储顺序。 你有任何关于在Python语言中解决这个问题的算法、脚本或方法的想法吗? 图1

2
这个问题是不适当的。对于任意一组点,您如何排序这些点的描述并不明确。 - hvwaldow
对于每个点和更新的原点,检查单位向量是否与上一次循环保持不变,并且大小是所有选项中的最小值...直到你用完维持初始单位向量的点,然后移动到下一个...即向右、向下、向左的向量。 - ldgorman
2
好的,你有给定的r和theta。只需按r排序,然后按负theta排序。当然,你可能会说,“我没有r和theta。我有x和y。”不要这么矩形... - Scott Mermelstein
3个回答

31

用一些三角函数并不难。也许你知道两个(标准化的)向量之间的角度是acos(vec1 * vec2)。然而,这只计算了投影角度,但可以使用atan2来计算方向感知角度。

因此,编写一个计算它并将其用作排序时的key的功能将是一个好方法:

import math

pts = [[2,3], [5,2],[4,1],[3.5,1],[1,2],[2,1],[3,1],[3,3],[4,3]]
origin = [2, 3]
refvec = [0, 1]

def clockwiseangle_and_distance(point):
    # Vector between point and the origin: v = p - o
    vector = [point[0]-origin[0], point[1]-origin[1]]
    # Length of vector: ||v||
    lenvector = math.hypot(vector[0], vector[1])
    # If length is zero there is no angle
    if lenvector == 0:
        return -math.pi, 0
    # Normalize vector: v/||v||
    normalized = [vector[0]/lenvector, vector[1]/lenvector]
    dotprod  = normalized[0]*refvec[0] + normalized[1]*refvec[1]     # x1*x2 + y1*y2
    diffprod = refvec[1]*normalized[0] - refvec[0]*normalized[1]     # x1*y2 - y1*x2
    angle = math.atan2(diffprod, dotprod)
    # Negative angles represent counter-clockwise angles so we need to subtract them 
    # from 2*pi (360 degrees)
    if angle < 0:
        return 2*math.pi+angle, lenvector
    # I return first the angle because that's the primary sorting criterium
    # but if two vectors have the same angle then the shorter distance should come first.
    return angle, lenvector

一个sorted运行:

>>> sorted(pts, key=clockwiseangle_and_distance)
[[2, 3], [3, 3], [4, 3], [5, 2], [4, 1], [3.5, 1], [3, 1], [2, 1], [1, 2]]

如果原点周围有一个矩形网格,那么这也能按预期工作:

>>> origin = [2,3]
>>> refvec = [0, 1]
>>> pts = [[1,4],[2,4],[3,4],[1,3],[2,3],[3,3],[1,2],[2,2],[3,2]]
>>> sorted(pts, key=clockwiseangle_and_distance)
[[2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4], [3, 3], [3, 2], [2, 2], [1, 2], [1, 3], [1, 4]]

即使您更改引用向量:

>>> origin = [2,3]
>>> refvec = [1,0]  # to the right instead of pointing up
>>> pts = [[1,4],[2,4],[3,4],[1,3],[2,3],[3,3],[1,2],[2,2],[3,2]]
>>> sorted(pts, key=clockwiseangle_and_distance)
[[2, 3], [3, 3], [3, 2], [2, 2], [1, 2], [1, 3], [1, 4], [2, 4], [3, 4]]

感谢 @Scott Mermelstein 提供更好的函数名和 @f5r5e5datan2 建议。

起初我有一个评论说“你应该按lenvectorangle进行排序”,但现在我仔细阅读后,我看到这就是您的angle函数正在做的。我能否建议重命名您的函数?我几乎会称其为“矩形到极坐标”,但您的系统比极坐标对这个问题更有用。为您的排序函数取一个类似的名称将有助于避免混淆。 - Scott Mermelstein
角度计算问题:所有角度计算最多只能模2pi;acos在pi处包裹,关于0对称;atan2更好,但仍然在2pi处包裹。 - f5r5e5d
@f5r5e5d 你说得对,我改变了答案。然而,atan2 应该足以表示 0360(或 02*math.pi)之间的所有角度。 - MSeifert
但是没有理由期望任意大的数据点集可以通过非相交分段螺旋轨迹连接,当按atan2排序时,需要保持角度历史记录,并通过添加2pi的倍数来包装超过2pi的角度。 - f5r5e5d
@f5r5e5d,我认为他只是想按顺时针角度排序,而不是要一个螺旋。但图片很酷! :-) - MSeifert
显示剩余3条评论

7

这应该说明问题,并提供可视化工具。

但是,对于在相同距离处获取一组点的正确入口点,它并不总是有效。

import random
import pylab
import cmath
from itertools import groupby 


pts = [(random.randrange(-5,5), random.randrange(-5,5)) for _ in range(10)]

# for this problem complex numbers are just too good to pass up

z_pts = [ i[0] + 1j*i[1] for i in pts if i != (0, 0)]

z_pts.sort(key = lambda x: abs(x))

gpts = [[*g] for _, g in groupby(z_pts, key = lambda x: abs(x) ) ]
print(*gpts, sep='\n')

spts = [1j/2]

for e in gpts:
    if len(e) > 1:
        se = sorted(e, key = lambda x: cmath.phase(-x / spts[-1]))
        spts += se
    else:
        spts += e

print(spts)

def XsYs(zs):
    xs = [z.real for z in zs]
    ys = [z.imag for z in zs]
    return xs, ys

def SpiralSeg(a, b):
    '''
    construct a clockwise spiral segment connecting
    ordered points a, b specified as complex numbers

    Inputs
        a, b complex numbers
    Output
        list of complex numbers
    '''
    seg = [a]
    if a == 0 or a == b:
        return seg
    # rotation interpolation with complex numbers!
    rot = ( b / a ) ** ( 1 / 30 ) 
    # impose cw rotation direction constraint
    if cmath.phase( b / a ) > 0: # add a halfway point to force long way around
        plr = cmath.polar( b / a )
        plr = (plr[0]**(1/2), plr[1] / 2 - 1 * cmath.pi ) # the rotor/2
        a_b = cmath.rect(*plr) * a   # rotate the start point halfway round   
        return SpiralSeg(a, a_b) + (SpiralSeg(a_b, b))

    for _ in range(30):
        a *= rot 
        seg.append(a)
    return seg  

segs = [SpiralSeg(a, b) for a, b in zip(spts, spts[1:])]

pylab.axes().set_aspect('equal', 'datalim')

pylab.scatter(*XsYs(z_pts))
for seg in segs:
   pylab.plot(*XsYs(seg))

[(1-2j), (-2-1j)]
[(2-3j)]
[(1+4j)]
[(3+3j)]
[(-3-4j), (3-4j), (4-3j)]
[(1-5j)]
[(-4-4j)]
[0.5j, (-2-1j), (1-2j), (2-3j), (1+4j), (3+3j), (-3-4j), (3-4j), (4-3j), (1-5j), (-4-4j)]

enter image description here

[-1j]
[(-1-1j)]
[(-1-2j), (-1+2j), (2+1j)]
[(-4+0j)]
[(1-4j)]
[-5j, (-4-3j)]
[(1-5j)]
[0.5j, -1j, (-1-1j), (-1-2j), (2+1j), (-1+2j), (-4+0j), (1-4j), (-4-3j), -5j, (1-5j)]

enter image description here


1
按角度排序是不够的
我们应该按极角和距离原点的字典顺序对点进行排序
我们按极角排序,如果有相同的情况,则按距离原点排序

网页内容由stack overflow 提供, 点击上面的
可以查看英文原文,
原文链接