这段代码如何引发ActiveRecord::ReadOnlyRecord异常？

Question

这段代码如何引发ActiveRecord::ReadOnlyRecord异常？

ruby-on-railsruby-on-rails-3activerecordreadonly

5

我有一个Purchase模型，它has_oneCoupon。

Purchase模型包含以下代码：

def decrement_coupon
  coupon = Coupon.find_by_code(coupon_code, :readonly => false)
  return unless coupon.respond_to?(:uses)
  coupon.uses = coupon.uses - 1
  coupon.save
end

但是我前几天遇到了这个错误：

ActiveRecord::ReadOnlyRecord - ActiveRecord::ReadOnlyRecord:
 /usr/local/rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2010.02@lyconic/gems/activerecord-3.0.6/lib/active_record/persistence.rb:245:in `create_or_update'
 /usr/local/rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2010.02@lyconic/gems/activerecord-3.0.6/lib/active_record/callbacks.rb:273:in `create_or_update'
 /usr/local/rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2010.02@lyconic/gems/activesupport-3.0.6/lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:419:in `_run_save_callbacks'
 /usr/local/rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2010.02@lyconic/gems/activerecord-3.0.6/lib/active_record/callbacks.rb:273:in `create_or_update'
 /usr/local/rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2010.02@lyconic/gems/activerecord-3.0.6/lib/active_record/persistence.rb:39:in `save'
 /usr/local/rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2010.02@lyconic/gems/activerecord-3.0.6/lib/active_record/validations.rb:43:in `save'
 /usr/local/rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2010.02@lyconic/gems/activerecord-3.0.6/lib/active_record/attribute_methods/dirty.rb:21:in `save'
 /usr/local/rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2010.02@lyconic/gems/activerecord-3.0.6/lib/active_record/transactions.rb:240:in `save'
 /usr/local/rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2010.02@lyconic/gems/activerecord-3.0.6/lib/active_record/transactions.rb:292:in `with_transaction_returning_status'
 /usr/local/rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2010.02@lyconic/gems/activerecord-3.0.6/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/database_statements.rb:139:in `transaction'
 /usr/local/rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2010.02@lyconic/gems/activerecord-3.0.6/lib/active_record/transactions.rb:207:in `transaction'
 /usr/local/rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2010.02@lyconic/gems/activerecord-3.0.6/lib/active_record/transactions.rb:290:in `with_transaction_returning_status'
 /usr/local/rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2010.02@lyconic/gems/activerecord-3.0.6/lib/active_record/transactions.rb:240:in `save'
 /usr/local/rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2010.02@lyconic/gems/activerecord-3.0.6/lib/active_record/transactions.rb:251:in `rollback_active_record_state!'
 /usr/local/rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2010.02@lyconic/gems/activerecord-3.0.6/lib/active_record/transactions.rb:239:in `save'
 /usr/local/rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2010.02@lyconic/gems/activerecord-3.0.6/lib/active_record/associations/association_proxy.rb:222:in `send'
 /usr/local/rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2010.02@lyconic/gems/activerecord-3.0.6/lib/active_record/associations/association_proxy.rb:222:in `method_missing'
 /var/www/88tactical_production/releases/20110823232510/app/models/purchase.rb:69:in `decrement_coupon'

< p > :readonly => false是否不能保证记录不是只读的？将此函数移至Coupon模型是否会有所区别？（无论如何，我可能会这样做）

- Adam Lassek

不是答案，但你尝试过 Coupon.readonly(false).find_by_code(code) 吗？我不记得看到 :readonly 选项被正式弃用，但我相信使用类似作用域的 Model.readonly 方法是“Rails 3 Way”。 - numbers1311407

在我的测试中，这两者之间没有区别，而且我认为我没有收到弃用警告。 - Adam Lassek

1个回答

网页内容由stack overflow 提供, 点击上面的

可以查看英文原文，
原文链接

- Winfield · Accepted Answer

这可能是由于您的 find_by_code() 帮助程序通过加入其他子值而导致的。

当 ActiveRecord 使用 joins 查找对象并返回附加值时，它会将该记录标记为只读。

关于此问题有一个详细的描述，请参见此问题

如果是这种情况，您可以通过将您的 :joins 转换成适当的 :include 来解决问题，从而在不标记它们为只读的情况下填充 ActiveRecord 实例。