Can i use JCheckbox to show "mixed state"

5
在Windows中,可以显示一个灰色的JCheckbox,以表明它所代表的数据集并非所有项目具有相同的值。
JCheckBox是否也能实现这一点?我该如何做到这一点?(希望不必覆盖它)
谢谢。

只是提醒一下 - 在UI设计中,灰色通常表示禁用,如果您将其用于其他用途,可能会让用户感到困惑。过去我曾看到有人在复选框处于混合状态时,将其显示为两种状态之一(已选择或未选择),并让用户自行确定是否应该选择它。 - aperkins
3个回答


1

需要一些工作,但是可以实现。

我有几年前的这段代码。它基于我在互联网上找到的一些示例,但我找不到原始创建者的任何参考资料,因此我道歉。

import javax.swing.*;
import javax.swing.event.ChangeListener;
import javax.swing.plaf.ActionMapUIResource;
import java.awt.event.*;

/**
 * Maintenance tip - There were some tricks to getting this code
 * working:
 * 
 * 1. You have to overwite addMouseListener() to do nothing
 * 2. You have to add a mouse event on mousePressed by calling
 * super.addMouseListener()
 * 3. You have to replace the UIActionMap for the keyboard event
 * "pressed" with your own one.
 * 4. You have to remove the UIActionMap for the keyboard event
 * "released".
 * 5. You have to grab focus when the next state is entered,
 * otherwise clicking on the component won't get the focus.
 * 6. You have to make a TristateDecorator as a button model that
 * wraps the original button model and does state management.
 */
public class TristateCheckBox extends JCheckBox {
  /** This is a type-safe enumerated type */
  public static class State { private State() { } }
  public static final State NOT_SELECTED = new State();
  public static final State SELECTED = new State();
  public static final State DONT_CARE = new State();

  private final TristateDecorator model;

  public TristateCheckBox(String text, Icon icon, State initial){
    super(text, icon);
    // Add a listener for when the mouse is pressed
    super.addMouseListener(new MouseAdapter() {
      public void mousePressed(MouseEvent e) {
        grabFocus();
        model.nextState();
      }
    });
    // Reset the keyboard action map
    ActionMap map = new ActionMapUIResource();
    map.put("pressed", new AbstractAction() {
      public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent e) {
        grabFocus();
        model.nextState();
      }
    });
    map.put("released", null);
    SwingUtilities.replaceUIActionMap(this, map);
    // set the model to the adapted model
    model = new TristateDecorator(getModel());
    setModel(model);
    setState(initial);
  }
  public TristateCheckBox(String text, State initial) {
    this(text, null, initial);
  }
  public TristateCheckBox(String text) {
    this(text, DONT_CARE);
  }
  public TristateCheckBox() {
    this(null);
  }

  /** No one may add mouse listeners, not even Swing! */
  public void addMouseListener(MouseListener l) { }
  /**
   * Set the new state to either SELECTED, NOT_SELECTED or
   * DONT_CARE.  If state == null, it is treated as DONT_CARE.
   */
  public void setState(State state) { model.setState(state); }
  /** Return the current state, which is determined by the
   * selection status of the model. */
  public State getState() { return model.getState(); }
  public void setSelected(boolean b) {
    if (b) {
      setState(SELECTED);
    } else {
      setState(NOT_SELECTED);
    }
  }
  /**
   * Exactly which Design Pattern is this?  Is it an Adapter,
   * a Proxy or a Decorator?  In this case, my vote lies with the
   * Decorator, because we are extending functionality and
   * "decorating" the original model with a more powerful model.
   */
  private class TristateDecorator implements ButtonModel {
    private final ButtonModel other;
    private TristateDecorator(ButtonModel other) {
      this.other = other;
    }
    private void setState(State state) {
      if (state == NOT_SELECTED) {
        other.setArmed(false);
        setPressed(false);
        setSelected(false);
      } else if (state == SELECTED) {
        other.setArmed(false);
        setPressed(false);
        setSelected(true);
      } else { // either "null" or DONT_CARE
        other.setArmed(true);
        setPressed(true);
        setSelected(true);
      }
    }
    /**
     * The current state is embedded in the selection / armed
     * state of the model.
     * 
     * We return the SELECTED state when the checkbox is selected
     * but not armed, DONT_CARE state when the checkbox is
     * selected and armed (grey) and NOT_SELECTED when the
     * checkbox is deselected.
     */
    private State getState() {
      if (isSelected() && !isArmed()) {
        // normal black tick
        return SELECTED;
      } else if (isSelected() && isArmed()) {
        // don't care grey tick
        return DONT_CARE;
      } else {
        // normal deselected
        return NOT_SELECTED;
      }
    }
    /** We rotate between NOT_SELECTED, SELECTED and DONT_CARE.*/
    private void nextState() {
      State current = getState();
      if (current == NOT_SELECTED) {
        setState(SELECTED);
      } else if (current == SELECTED) {
        setState(DONT_CARE);
      } else if (current == DONT_CARE) {
        setState(NOT_SELECTED);
      }
    }
    /** Filter: No one may change the armed status except us. */
    public void setArmed(boolean b) {
    }
    /** We disable focusing on the component when it is not
     * enabled. */
    public void setEnabled(boolean b) {
      setFocusable(b);
      other.setEnabled(b);
    }
    /** All these methods simply delegate to the "other" model
     * that is being decorated. */
    public boolean isArmed() { return other.isArmed(); }
    public boolean isSelected() { return other.isSelected(); }
    public boolean isEnabled() { return other.isEnabled(); }
    public boolean isPressed() { return other.isPressed(); }
    public boolean isRollover() { return other.isRollover(); }
    public void setSelected(boolean b) { other.setSelected(b); }
    public void setPressed(boolean b) { other.setPressed(b); }
    public void setRollover(boolean b) { other.setRollover(b); }
    public void setMnemonic(int key) { other.setMnemonic(key); }
    public int getMnemonic() { return other.getMnemonic(); }
    public void setActionCommand(String s) {
      other.setActionCommand(s);
    }
    public String getActionCommand() {
      return other.getActionCommand();
    }
    public void setGroup(ButtonGroup group) {
      other.setGroup(group);
    }
    public void addActionListener(ActionListener l) {
      other.addActionListener(l);
    }
    public void removeActionListener(ActionListener l) {
      other.removeActionListener(l);
    }
    public void addItemListener(ItemListener l) {
      other.addItemListener(l);
    }
    public void removeItemListener(ItemListener l) {
      other.removeItemListener(l);
    }
    public void addChangeListener(ChangeListener l) {
      other.addChangeListener(l);
    }
    public void removeChangeListener(ChangeListener l) {
      other.removeChangeListener(l);
    }
    public Object[] getSelectedObjects() {
      return other.getSelectedObjects();
    }
  }
}

感谢您的努力!但我正在寻找一种不覆盖它的方法。抱歉没有提到这一点。 - Houtman
普通的 JCheckBox 无法实现此功能。您必须自己编写并扩展 JCheckBox 是最简单的方法。 - Bombe

0

这个问题来自我的同事,他想到了以下解决方案:

  1. 创建一个禁用且选中的虚拟 JCheckBox,并设置与真实 JCheckBox 相同的大小。
  2. 创建一个图标,其绘制方法实际上绘制虚拟 JCheckBox。
  3. 将原始 JCheckBox 的图标设置为绘制虚拟 JCheckBox 的图标。
  4. 在单击 JCheckBox 后立即删除图标。

++ 没有重写 JCheckBox

-- 不是真正的三态组合框

我认为他很满意。感谢您的帮助。


网页内容由stack overflow 提供, 点击上面的
可以查看英文原文,
原文链接