我在Clojure中实现一些基本复数运算时发现，即使有类型提示，它的速度大约比相似的Java代码慢了10倍。
比较：
比较：
(defn plus [[^double x1 ^double y1] [^double x2 ^double y2]]
[(+ x1 x2) (+ y1 y2)])
(defn times [[^double x1 ^double y1] [^double x2 ^double y2]]
[(- (* x1 x2) (* y1 y2)) (+ (* x1 y2) (* y1 x2))])
(time (dorun (repeatedly 100000 #(plus [1 0] [0 1]))))
(time (dorun (repeatedly 100000 #(times [1 0] [0 1]))))
输出：
"Elapsed time: 69.429796 msecs"
"Elapsed time: 72.232479 msecs"
使用:
public static void main( String[] args ) {
double[] z1 = new double[] { 1, 0 };
double[] z2 = new double[] { 0, 1 };
double[] z3 = null;
long l_StartTimeMillis = System.currentTimeMillis();
for ( int i = 0; i < 100000; i++ ) {
z3 = plus( z1, z2 ); // assign result to dummy var to stop compiler from optimising the loop away
}
long l_EndTimeMillis = System.currentTimeMillis();
long l_TimeTakenMillis = l_EndTimeMillis - l_StartTimeMillis;
System.out.format( "Time taken: %d millis\n", l_TimeTakenMillis );
l_StartTimeMillis = System.currentTimeMillis();
for ( int i = 0; i < 100000; i++ ) {
z3 = times( z1, z2 );
}
l_EndTimeMillis = System.currentTimeMillis();
l_TimeTakenMillis = l_EndTimeMillis - l_StartTimeMillis;
System.out.format( "Time taken: %d millis\n", l_TimeTakenMillis );
doNothing( z3 );
}
private static void doNothing( double[] z ) {
}
public static double[] plus (double[] z1, double[] z2) {
return new double[] { z1[0] + z2[0], z1[1] + z2[1] };
}
public static double[] times (double[] z1, double[] z2) {
return new double[] { z1[0]*z2[0] - z1[1]*z2[1], z1[0]*z2[1] + z1[1]*z2[0] };
}
输出：
Time taken: 6 millis
Time taken: 6 millis
事实上，类型提示似乎没有太大的区别：如果我删除它们，我得到的结果大致相同。而真正奇怪的是，如果我在没有 REPL 的情况下运行 Clojure 脚本，我会得到更慢的结果：
"Elapsed time: 137.337782 msecs"
"Elapsed time: 214.213993 msecs"
我的问题是：如何接近Java代码的性能？而且为什么在没有REPL的情况下运行Clojure表达式需要更长的时间来评估？
更新 ==============
使用带有类型提示的deftype和defn中的deftype，以及使用dotimes而不是repeatedly可以实现与Java版本一样或更好的性能。谢谢你们两个。
(deftype complex [^double real ^double imag])
(defn plus [^complex z1 ^complex z2]
(let [x1 (double (.real z1))
y1 (double (.imag z1))
x2 (double (.real z2))
y2 (double (.imag z2))]
(complex. (+ x1 x2) (+ y1 y2))))
(defn times [^complex z1 ^complex z2]
(let [x1 (double (.real z1))
y1 (double (.imag z1))
x2 (double (.real z2))
y2 (double (.imag z2))]
(complex. (- (* x1 x2) (* y1 y2)) (+ (* x1 y2) (* y1 x2)))))
(println "Warm up")
(time (dorun (repeatedly 100000 #(plus (complex. 1 0) (complex. 0 1)))))
(time (dorun (repeatedly 100000 #(times (complex. 1 0) (complex. 0 1)))))
(time (dorun (repeatedly 100000 #(plus (complex. 1 0) (complex. 0 1)))))
(time (dorun (repeatedly 100000 #(times (complex. 1 0) (complex. 0 1)))))
(time (dorun (repeatedly 100000 #(plus (complex. 1 0) (complex. 0 1)))))
(time (dorun (repeatedly 100000 #(times (complex. 1 0) (complex. 0 1)))))
(println "Try with dorun")
(time (dorun (repeatedly 100000 #(plus (complex. 1 0) (complex. 0 1)))))
(time (dorun (repeatedly 100000 #(times (complex. 1 0) (complex. 0 1)))))
(println "Try with dotimes")
(time (dotimes [_ 100000]
(plus (complex. 1 0) (complex. 0 1))))
(time (dotimes [_ 100000]
(times (complex. 1 0) (complex. 0 1))))
输出：
Warm up
"Elapsed time: 92.805664 msecs"
"Elapsed time: 164.929421 msecs"
"Elapsed time: 23.799012 msecs"
"Elapsed time: 32.841624 msecs"
"Elapsed time: 20.886101 msecs"
"Elapsed time: 18.872783 msecs"
Try with dorun
"Elapsed time: 19.238403 msecs"
"Elapsed time: 17.856938 msecs"
Try with dotimes
"Elapsed time: 5.165658 msecs"
"Elapsed time: 5.209027 msecs"
*warn-on-reflection*来查看是否有任何反射 sneaking in 吗？ - DaoWen(set! *warn-on-reflection* true)并再次运行了脚本，但是没有警告打印到标准输出，这意味着没有使用反射，对吗？只是想确保我使用得正确。 - OpenSauce