我正在尝试调试一个使用pynetdicom库的应用程序。我不确定这个具体细节有多重要,但是重要的是它大量使用多线程来运行后台套接字监听任务,而不会阻塞主线程。storescp.py示例可用于复制此操作。
每当我放置一个遇到断点(无论在哪个线程中,主线程或子线程)时,我都会得到以下回溯:
我的想法是,为了使事情正常工作,PyDev可能会对生成的线程进行
当然,我不太了解PyDev,无法确认这个理论或修复它。并且似乎互联网也不知道。
子类化
每当我放置一个遇到断点(无论在哪个线程中,主线程或子线程)时,我都会得到以下回溯:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/Applications/Aptana Studio 3/plugins/org.python.pydev_2.7.0.2013012902/pysrc/pydevd.py", line 1397, in <module>
debugger.run(setup['file'], None, None)
File "/Applications/Aptana Studio 3/plugins/org.python.pydev_2.7.0.2013012902/pysrc/pydevd.py", line 1090, in run
pydev_imports.execfile(file, globals, locals) #execute the script
File "/Users/alexw/Development/Python/kreport2/KReport2/dicomdatascraper.py", line 183, in <module>
oldDicomList = copy.copy(newData)
File "/Users/alexw/Development/Python/kreport2/KReport2/dicomdatascraper.py", line 183, in <module>
oldDicomList = copy.copy(newData)
File "/Applications/Aptana Studio 3/plugins/org.python.pydev_2.7.0.2013012902/pysrc/pydevd_frame.py", line 135, in trace_dispatch
self.doWaitSuspend(thread, frame, event, arg)
File "/Applications/Aptana Studio 3/plugins/org.python.pydev_2.7.0.2013012902/pysrc/pydevd_frame.py", line 25, in doWaitSuspend
self._args[0].doWaitSuspend(*args, **kwargs)
File "/Applications/Aptana Studio 3/plugins/org.python.pydev_2.7.0.2013012902/pysrc/pydevd.py", line 832, in doWaitSuspend
self.processInternalCommands()
File "/Applications/Aptana Studio 3/plugins/org.python.pydev_2.7.0.2013012902/pysrc/pydevd.py", line 360, in processInternalCommands
thread_id = GetThreadId(t)
File "/Applications/Aptana Studio 3/plugins/org.python.pydev_2.7.0.2013012902/pysrc/pydevd_constants.py", line 140, in GetThreadId
return thread.__pydevd_id__
File "/Users/alexw/.virtualenvs/kreport2dev/devlibs/pynetdicom/source/netdicom/applicationentity.py", line 73, in __getattr__
obj = eval(attr)()
File "<string>", line 1, in <module>
NameError: name '__pydevd_id__' is not defined
我的想法是,为了使事情正常工作,PyDev可能会对生成的线程进行
__pydevd_id__
的猴子补丁,但由于它们实际上是子类而不是直接实例化threading.Thread
(在这种情况下,工作者是class Association(threading.Thread):
的实例),因此未能将其修补到这些线程中。当然,我不太了解PyDev,无法确认这个理论或修复它。并且似乎互联网也不知道。
子类化
Thread
是如此罕见的模式,以至于它在PyDev架构中根本没有被考虑吗?如果不重新设计库,该如何解决这个问题?