这个答案中的查询受到了Itzik Ben-Gan的
Packing Intervals的启发。
起初,我没有完全理解要求的复杂性,并假设
Table1
和
Table2
中的间隔不重叠。我认为同一教练不能同时忙碌和可用。
事实证明我的假设是错误的,因此我留下的第一个变体查询必须扩展预处理步骤,从
Table1
存储的所有间隔中减去存储在
Table2
中的间隔。
它使用类似的想法。每个“可用”时间间隔的开始都用+1
EventType
标记,结束则用-1
EventType
标记。对于“忙碌”间隔,标记被反转。“忙碌”间隔以-1开始,以+1结束。这在
C1_Subtract
中完成。
然后运行总数告诉我们“真正”可用的时间间隔在哪里(
C2_Subtract
)。最后,
CTE_Available
只保留“真正”可用的时间间隔。
示例数据
我添加了几行来说明如果没有教练可用会发生什么。我还添加了
CoachID=9
,它不在第一个变体查询的初始结果中。
CREATE TABLE #Temp1 (CoachID INT, BusyST DATETIME, BusyET DATETIME);
CREATE TABLE #Temp2 (CoachID INT, AvailableST DATETIME, AvailableET DATETIME);
INSERT INTO #Temp1 (CoachID, BusyST, BusyET) VALUES
(1, '2016-08-17 09:12:00','2016-08-17 10:11:00'),
(3, '2016-08-17 09:30:00','2016-08-17 10:00:00'),
(4, '2016-08-17 12:07:00','2016-08-17 13:10:00'),
(6, '2016-08-17 15:00:00','2016-08-17 16:00:00'),
(9, '2016-08-17 15:00:00','2016-08-17 16:00:00');
INSERT INTO #Temp2 (CoachID, AvailableST, AvailableET) VALUES
(1,'2016-08-17 09:07:00','2016-08-17 11:09:00'),
(2,'2016-08-17 09:11:00','2016-08-17 09:30:00'),
(3,'2016-08-17 09:24:00','2016-08-17 13:08:00'),
(1,'2016-08-17 11:34:00','2016-08-17 12:27:00'),
(4,'2016-08-17 09:34:00','2016-08-17 13:00:00'),
(5,'2016-08-17 09:10:00','2016-08-17 09:55:00'),
(7,'2016-08-17 15:10:00','2016-08-17 15:20:00'),
(8,'2016-08-17 15:15:00','2016-08-17 15:25:00'),
(7,'2016-08-17 15:40:00','2016-08-17 15:55:00'),
(9,'2016-08-17 15:05:00','2016-08-17 15:07:00'),
(9,'2016-08-17 15:40:00','2016-08-17 16:55:00');
< p >
CTE_Available的中间结果
+---------+-------------------------+-------------------------+
| CoachID | AvailableST | AvailableET |
+---------+-------------------------+-------------------------+
| 1 | 2016-08-17 09:07:00.000 | 2016-08-17 09:12:00.000 |
| 1 | 2016-08-17 10:11:00.000 | 2016-08-17 11:09:00.000 |
| 1 | 2016-08-17 11:34:00.000 | 2016-08-17 12:27:00.000 |
| 2 | 2016-08-17 09:11:00.000 | 2016-08-17 09:30:00.000 |
| 3 | 2016-08-17 09:24:00.000 | 2016-08-17 09:30:00.000 |
| 3 | 2016-08-17 10:00:00.000 | 2016-08-17 13:08:00.000 |
| 4 | 2016-08-17 09:34:00.000 | 2016-08-17 12:07:00.000 |
| 5 | 2016-08-17 09:10:00.000 | 2016-08-17 09:55:00.000 |
| 7 | 2016-08-17 15:10:00.000 | 2016-08-17 15:20:00.000 |
| 7 | 2016-08-17 15:40:00.000 | 2016-08-17 15:55:00.000 |
| 8 | 2016-08-17 15:15:00.000 | 2016-08-17 15:25:00.000 |
| 9 | 2016-08-17 16:00:00.000 | 2016-08-17 16:55:00.000 |
+---------+-------------------------+-------------------------+
现在我们可以使用这些
CTE_Available
的中间结果,而不是在第一个查询变体中使用
#Temp2
。请参见查询的第一个变体下面的详细说明。
完整查询:
WITH
C1_Subtract
AS
(
SELECT
CoachID
,AvailableST AS ts
,+1 AS EventType
FROM #Temp2
UNION ALL
SELECT
CoachID
,AvailableET AS ts
,-1 AS EventType
FROM #Temp2
UNION ALL
SELECT
CoachID
,BusyST AS ts
,-1 AS EventType
FROM #Temp1
UNION ALL
SELECT
CoachID
,BusyET AS ts
,+1 AS EventType
FROM #Temp1
)
,C2_Subtract AS
(
SELECT
C1_Subtract.*
,SUM(EventType)
OVER (
PARTITION BY CoachID
ORDER BY ts, EventType DESC
ROWS BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW)
AS cnt
,LEAD(ts)
OVER (
PARTITION BY CoachID
ORDER BY ts, EventType DESC)
AS NextTS
FROM C1_Subtract
)
,CTE_Available
AS
(
SELECT
C2_Subtract.CoachID
,C2_Subtract.ts AS AvailableST
,C2_Subtract.NextTS AS AvailableET
FROM C2_Subtract
WHERE cnt > 0
)
,CTE_Intervals
AS
(
SELECT
TBusy.CoachID AS BusyCoachID
,TBusy.BusyST
,TBusy.BusyET
,CA.CoachID AS AvailableCoachID
,CA.AvailableST
,CA.AvailableET
,CASE WHEN CA.AvailableST < TBusy.BusyST
THEN TBusy.BusyST
ELSE CA.AvailableST
END AS ST
,CASE WHEN CA.AvailableET > TBusy.BusyET
THEN TBusy.BusyET
ELSE CA.AvailableET
END AS ET
FROM
#Temp1 AS TBusy
CROSS APPLY
(
SELECT
TAvailable.*
FROM
CTE_Available AS TAvailable
WHERE
TAvailable.CoachID <> TBusy.CoachID
AND TAvailable.AvailableST < TBusy.BusyET
AND TAvailable.AvailableET > TBusy.BusyST
) AS CA
)
,C1 AS
(
SELECT
BusyCoachID
,AvailableCoachID
,ST AS ts
,+1 AS EventType
FROM CTE_Intervals
UNION ALL
SELECT
BusyCoachID
,AvailableCoachID
,ET AS ts
,-1 AS EventType
FROM CTE_Intervals
UNION ALL
SELECT
CoachID AS BusyCoachID
,CoachID AS AvailableCoachID
,BusyST AS ts
,+1 AS EventType
FROM #Temp1
UNION ALL
SELECT
CoachID AS BusyCoachID
,CoachID AS AvailableCoachID
,BusyET AS ts
,-1 AS EventType
FROM #Temp1
)
,C2 AS
(
SELECT
C1.*
,SUM(EventType)
OVER (
PARTITION BY BusyCoachID
ORDER BY ts, EventType DESC, AvailableCoachID
ROWS BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW)
- 1 AS cnt
,LEAD(ts)
OVER (
PARTITION BY BusyCoachID
ORDER BY ts, EventType DESC, AvailableCoachID)
AS NextTS
FROM C1
)
SELECT
BusyCoachID AS CoachID
,ts AS CanCoachST
,NextTS AS CanCoachET
,cnt AS NumOfCoaches
FROM C2
WHERE ts <> NextTS
ORDER BY BusyCoachID, CanCoachST
;
最终结果。
+---------+-------------------------+-------------------------+--------------+
| CoachID | CanCoachST | CanCoachET | NumOfCoaches |
+---------+-------------------------+-------------------------+--------------+
| 1 | 2016-08-17 09:12:00.000 | 2016-08-17 09:24:00.000 | 2 |
| 1 | 2016-08-17 09:24:00.000 | 2016-08-17 09:30:00.000 | 3 |
| 1 | 2016-08-17 09:30:00.000 | 2016-08-17 09:34:00.000 | 1 |
| 1 | 2016-08-17 09:34:00.000 | 2016-08-17 09:55:00.000 | 2 |
| 1 | 2016-08-17 09:55:00.000 | 2016-08-17 10:00:00.000 | 1 |
| 1 | 2016-08-17 10:00:00.000 | 2016-08-17 10:11:00.000 | 2 |
| 3 | 2016-08-17 09:30:00.000 | 2016-08-17 09:34:00.000 | 1 |
| 3 | 2016-08-17 09:34:00.000 | 2016-08-17 09:55:00.000 | 2 |
| 3 | 2016-08-17 09:55:00.000 | 2016-08-17 10:00:00.000 | 1 |
| 4 | 2016-08-17 12:07:00.000 | 2016-08-17 12:27:00.000 | 2 |
| 4 | 2016-08-17 12:27:00.000 | 2016-08-17 13:08:00.000 | 1 |
| 4 | 2016-08-17 13:08:00.000 | 2016-08-17 13:10:00.000 | 0 |
| 6 | 2016-08-17 15:00:00.000 | 2016-08-17 15:10:00.000 | 0 |
| 6 | 2016-08-17 15:10:00.000 | 2016-08-17 15:15:00.000 | 1 |
| 6 | 2016-08-17 15:15:00.000 | 2016-08-17 15:20:00.000 | 2 |
| 6 | 2016-08-17 15:20:00.000 | 2016-08-17 15:25:00.000 | 1 |
| 6 | 2016-08-17 15:25:00.000 | 2016-08-17 15:40:00.000 | 0 |
| 6 | 2016-08-17 15:40:00.000 | 2016-08-17 15:55:00.000 | 1 |
| 6 | 2016-08-17 15:55:00.000 | 2016-08-17 16:00:00.000 | 0 |
| 9 | 2016-08-17 15:00:00.000 | 2016-08-17 15:10:00.000 | 0 |
| 9 | 2016-08-17 15:10:00.000 | 2016-08-17 15:15:00.000 | 1 |
| 9 | 2016-08-17 15:15:00.000 | 2016-08-17 15:20:00.000 | 2 |
| 9 | 2016-08-17 15:20:00.000 | 2016-08-17 15:25:00.000 | 1 |
| 9 | 2016-08-17 15:25:00.000 | 2016-08-17 15:40:00.000 | 0 |
| 9 | 2016-08-17 15:40:00.000 | 2016-08-17 15:55:00.000 | 1 |
| 9 | 2016-08-17 15:55:00.000 | 2016-08-17 16:00:00.000 | 0 |
+---------+-------------------------+-------------------------+--------------+
我建议创建以下索引,以避免执行计划中的一些排序。
CREATE UNIQUE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [IX_CoachID_BusyST] ON #Temp1
(
CoachID ASC,
BusyST ASC
);
CREATE UNIQUE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [IX_CoachID_BusyET] ON #Temp1
(
CoachID ASC,
BusyET ASC
);
CREATE UNIQUE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [IX_CoachID_AvailableST] ON #Temp2
(
CoachID ASC,
AvailableST ASC
);
CREATE UNIQUE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [IX_CoachID_AvailableET] ON #Temp2
(
CoachID ASC,
AvailableET ASC
);
然而,在真实数据中,瓶颈可能在其他地方,这可能取决于数据分布情况。该查询相当复杂,如果没有真实数据来调整它,那么就会有太多的猜测。
查询的第一个变体
逐步运行查询,逐个运行CTE,并检查中间结果以了解其工作方式。
CTE_Intervals
提供了与忙碌时间交叉的可用时间段列表。
C1
将开始和结束时间放入同一列,并附带 EventType
。这将帮助我们跟踪时间间隔的开始或结束。
通过 EventType
的运行总数给出可用教练的数量。 C1
将忙碌的教练合并到混合中,以正确计算没有可用教练的情况。
WITH
CTE_Intervals
AS
(
SELECT
TBusy.CoachID AS BusyCoachID
,TBusy.BusyST
,TBusy.BusyET
,CA.CoachID AS AvailableCoachID
,CA.AvailableST
,CA.AvailableET
,CASE WHEN CA.AvailableST < TBusy.BusyST
THEN TBusy.BusyST
ELSE CA.AvailableST
END AS ST
,CASE WHEN CA.AvailableET > TBusy.BusyET
THEN TBusy.BusyET
ELSE CA.AvailableET
END AS ET
FROM
#Temp1 AS TBusy
CROSS APPLY
(
SELECT
TAvailable.*
FROM
#Temp2 AS TAvailable
WHERE
TAvailable.CoachID <> TBusy.CoachID
AND TAvailable.AvailableST < TBusy.BusyET
AND TAvailable.AvailableET > TBusy.BusyST
) AS CA
)
,C1 AS
(
SELECT
BusyCoachID
,AvailableCoachID
,ST AS ts
,+1 AS EventType
FROM CTE_Intervals
UNION ALL
SELECT
BusyCoachID
,AvailableCoachID
,ET AS ts
,-1 AS EventType
FROM CTE_Intervals
UNION ALL
SELECT
CoachID AS BusyCoachID
,CoachID AS AvailableCoachID
,BusyST AS ts
,+1 AS EventType
FROM #Temp1
UNION ALL
SELECT
CoachID AS BusyCoachID
,CoachID AS AvailableCoachID
,BusyET AS ts
,-1 AS EventType
FROM #Temp1
)
,C2 AS
(
SELECT
C1.*
,SUM(EventType)
OVER (
PARTITION BY BusyCoachID
ORDER BY ts, EventType DESC, AvailableCoachID
ROWS BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW)
- 1 AS cnt
,LEAD(ts)
OVER (
PARTITION BY BusyCoachID
ORDER BY ts, EventType DESC, AvailableCoachID)
AS NextTS
FROM C1
)
SELECT
BusyCoachID AS CoachID
,ts AS CanCoachST
,NextTS AS CanCoachET
,cnt AS NumOfCoaches
FROM C2
WHERE ts <> NextTS
ORDER BY BusyCoachID, CanCoachST
;
DROP TABLE #Temp1;
DROP TABLE #Temp2;
结果
我已经为每行代码添加了可用教练的ID注释并进行了计数。
现在我明白了为什么我的初始结果与您期望的结果不同。
+---------+---------------------+---------------------+--------------+
| CoachID | CanCoachST | CanCoachET | NumOfCoaches |
+---------+---------------------+---------------------+--------------+
| 1 | 2016-08-17 09:12:00 | 2016-08-17 09:24:00 | 2 | 2,5
| 1 | 2016-08-17 09:24:00 | 2016-08-17 09:30:00 | 3 | 2,3,5
| 1 | 2016-08-17 09:30:00 | 2016-08-17 09:34:00 | 2 | 3,5
| 1 | 2016-08-17 09:34:00 | 2016-08-17 09:55:00 | 3 | 3,4,5
| 1 | 2016-08-17 09:55:00 | 2016-08-17 10:11:00 | 2 | 3,4
| 3 | 2016-08-17 09:30:00 | 2016-08-17 09:34:00 | 2 | 1,5
| 3 | 2016-08-17 09:34:00 | 2016-08-17 09:55:00 | 3 | 1,4,5
| 3 | 2016-08-17 09:55:00 | 2016-08-17 10:00:00 | 2 | 1,4
| 4 | 2016-08-17 12:07:00 | 2016-08-17 12:27:00 | 2 | 3,1
| 4 | 2016-08-17 12:27:00 | 2016-08-17 13:08:00 | 1 | 3
| 4 | 2016-08-17 13:08:00 | 2016-08-17 13:10:00 | 0 | none
| 6 | 2016-08-17 15:00:00 | 2016-08-17 15:10:00 | 0 | none
| 6 | 2016-08-17 15:10:00 | 2016-08-17 15:15:00 | 1 | 7
| 6 | 2016-08-17 15:15:00 | 2016-08-17 15:20:00 | 2 | 7,8
| 6 | 2016-08-17 15:20:00 | 2016-08-17 15:25:00 | 1 | 8
| 6 | 2016-08-17 15:25:00 | 2016-08-17 15:40:00 | 0 | none
| 6 | 2016-08-17 15:40:00 | 2016-08-17 15:55:00 | 1 | 7
| 6 | 2016-08-17 15:55:00 | 2016-08-17 16:00:00 | 0 | none
+---------+---------------------+---------------------+--------------+