reader = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(inputStream))
reader = new InputStreamReader(new BufferedInputStream(inputStream))
哪一个更好?为什么?
答案:第一个更好,因为它使用了缓冲区,可以提高读取数据的效率。
reader = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(inputStream))
reader = new InputStreamReader(new BufferedInputStream(inputStream))
哪一个更好?为什么?
不要在没有提供编码的情况下创建Reader
。正如@CodeScale已经提到的那样,第一种选项更好,因为它更好地利用了BufferedReader
并且有方便的方法。
reader = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(inputStream), StandardCharsets.UTF_8);
解决方案1更高效。
BufferedReader
可以拥有比InputStreamReader
更大的缓存。
此外,使用 BufferedReader
可以方便地使用 readline
方法。
基准测试表明第一种方式(reader = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(inputStream))
)要快得多。
但我不知道为什么。
package org.apache.commons.io.jmh;
import java.io.BufferedInputStream;
import java.io.BufferedReader;
import java.io.FileInputStream;
import java.io.FileNotFoundException;
import java.io.InputStreamReader;
import java.io.Reader;
import java.net.URISyntaxException;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.Benchmark;
import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.BenchmarkMode;
import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.Fork;
import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.Measurement;
import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.Mode;
import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.OutputTimeUnit;
import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.Scope;
import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.State;
import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.Warmup;
import org.openjdk.jmh.infra.Blackhole;
@BenchmarkMode(Mode.AverageTime)
@OutputTimeUnit(TimeUnit.NANOSECONDS)
@State(Scope.Thread)
@Warmup(iterations = 5, time = 10, timeUnit = TimeUnit.SECONDS)
@Measurement(iterations = 5, time = 10, timeUnit = TimeUnit.SECONDS)
@Fork(value = 1, jvmArgs = {"-server"})
public class IOUtilsContentEqualsReadersBenchmark {
private static final String TEST_PATH_16K_A = "/org/apache/commons/io/abitmorethan16k.txt";
public static FileInputStream getInputStream() throws URISyntaxException, FileNotFoundException {
return new FileInputStream(IOUtilsContentEqualsReadersBenchmark.class.getResource(TEST_PATH_16K_A).toURI().getPath());
}
@Benchmark
public static void read1(Blackhole blackhole) throws Exception {
Reader reader = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(getInputStream()));
while (true) {
int res = reader.read();
blackhole.consume(res);
if (res == -1) {
return;
}
}
}
@Benchmark
public static void read2(Blackhole blackhole) throws Exception {
Reader reader = new InputStreamReader(new BufferedInputStream(getInputStream()));
while (true) {
int res = reader.read();
blackhole.consume(res);
if (res == -1) {
return;
}
}
}
@Benchmark
public static void read3(Blackhole blackhole) throws Exception {
Reader reader = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(new BufferedInputStream(getInputStream())));
while (true) {
int res = reader.read();
blackhole.consume(res);
if (res == -1) {
return;
}
}
}
}
[INFO] --- exec-maven-plugin:3.0.0:exec (benchmark) @ commons-io ---
# JMH version: 1.27
# VM version: JDK 1.8.0_275, OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM, 25.275-b01
# VM invoker: C:\jdk8u275-b01\jre\bin\java.exe
# VM options: -server
# JMH blackhole mode: full blackhole + dont-inline hint
# Warmup: 5 iterations, 10 s each
# Measurement: 5 iterations, 10 s each
# Timeout: 10 min per iteration
# Threads: 1 thread, will synchronize iterations
# Benchmark mode: Average time, time/op
# Benchmark: org.apache.commons.io.jmh.IOUtilsContentEqualsReadersBenchmark.read1
# Run progress: 0.00% complete, ETA 00:05:00
# Fork: 1 of 1
# Warmup Iteration 1: 141144.322 ns/op
# Warmup Iteration 2: 126969.546 ns/op
# Warmup Iteration 3: 117894.788 ns/op
# Warmup Iteration 4: 118555.020 ns/op
# Warmup Iteration 5: 117377.183 ns/op
Iteration 1: 118137.872 ns/op
Iteration 2: 117869.504 ns/op
Iteration 3: 117894.961 ns/op
Iteration 4: 118090.279 ns/op
Iteration 5: 117234.480 ns/op
Result "org.apache.commons.io.jmh.IOUtilsContentEqualsReadersBenchmark.read1":
117845.419 ��(99.9%) 1390.724 ns/op [Average]
(min, avg, max) = (117234.480, 117845.419, 118137.872), stdev = 361.167
CI (99.9%): [116454.695, 119236.143] (assumes normal distribution)
# JMH version: 1.27
# VM version: JDK 1.8.0_275, OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM, 25.275-b01
# VM invoker: C:\jdk8u275-b01\jre\bin\java.exe
# VM options: -server
# JMH blackhole mode: full blackhole + dont-inline hint
# Warmup: 5 iterations, 10 s each
# Measurement: 5 iterations, 10 s each
# Timeout: 10 min per iteration
# Threads: 1 thread, will synchronize iterations
# Benchmark mode: Average time, time/op
# Benchmark: org.apache.commons.io.jmh.IOUtilsContentEqualsReadersBenchmark.read2
# Run progress: 33.33% complete, ETA 00:03:20
# Fork: 1 of 1
# Warmup Iteration 1: 287001.406 ns/op
# Warmup Iteration 2: 269609.908 ns/op
# Warmup Iteration 3: 268606.597 ns/op
# Warmup Iteration 4: 259708.116 ns/op
# Warmup Iteration 5: 256359.254 ns/op
Iteration 1: 256837.341 ns/op
Iteration 2: 257773.909 ns/op
Iteration 3: 256669.369 ns/op
Iteration 4: 258031.384 ns/op
Iteration 5: 258269.111 ns/op
Result "org.apache.commons.io.jmh.IOUtilsContentEqualsReadersBenchmark.read2":
257516.223 ��(99.9%) 2774.519 ns/op [Average]
(min, avg, max) = (256669.369, 257516.223, 258269.111), stdev = 720.534
CI (99.9%): [254741.704, 260290.742] (assumes normal distribution)
# JMH version: 1.27
# VM version: JDK 1.8.0_275, OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM, 25.275-b01
# VM invoker: C:\jdk8u275-b01\jre\bin\java.exe
# VM options: -server
# JMH blackhole mode: full blackhole + dont-inline hint
# Warmup: 5 iterations, 10 s each
# Measurement: 5 iterations, 10 s each
# Timeout: 10 min per iteration
# Threads: 1 thread, will synchronize iterations
# Benchmark mode: Average time, time/op
# Benchmark: org.apache.commons.io.jmh.IOUtilsContentEqualsReadersBenchmark.read3
# Run progress: 66.67% complete, ETA 00:01:40
# Fork: 1 of 1
# Warmup Iteration 1: 146614.866 ns/op
# Warmup Iteration 2: 131029.887 ns/op
# Warmup Iteration 3: 120476.530 ns/op
# Warmup Iteration 4: 121140.296 ns/op
# Warmup Iteration 5: 119992.159 ns/op
Iteration 1: 120754.048 ns/op
Iteration 2: 120544.731 ns/op
Iteration 3: 120556.412 ns/op
Iteration 4: 120781.589 ns/op
Iteration 5: 120338.529 ns/op
Result "org.apache.commons.io.jmh.IOUtilsContentEqualsReadersBenchmark.read3":
120595.062 ��(99.9%) 693.931 ns/op [Average]
(min, avg, max) = (120338.529, 120595.062, 120781.589), stdev = 180.212
CI (99.9%): [119901.131, 121288.993] (assumes normal distribution)
# Run complete. Total time: 00:05:01
REMEMBER: The numbers below are just data. To gain reusable insights, you need to follow up on
why the numbers are the way they are. Use profilers (see -prof, -lprof), design factorial
experiments, perform baseline and negative tests that provide experimental control, make sure
the benchmarking environment is safe on JVM/OS/HW level, ask for reviews from the domain experts.
Do not assume the numbers tell you what you want them to tell.
Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units
IOUtilsContentEqualsReadersBenchmark.read1 avgt 5 117845.419 �� 1390.724 ns/op
IOUtilsContentEqualsReadersBenchmark.read2 avgt 5 257516.223 �� 2774.519 ns/op
IOUtilsContentEqualsReadersBenchmark.read3 avgt 5 120595.062 �� 693.931 ns/op
Benchmark result is saved to target/jmh-result.org.apache.json
解决方案1更加高效。
BufferedReader将从Reader中读取一块字符(通常是到一个char数组中)。read()方法将从内部数组返回数据。
FileReader
,因为您无法提供字符集。请改用Files.newBufferedReader(Paths.get("filename"), StandardCharsets.UTF_8)
。如果您想提供自定义缓冲区大小,则需要使用BufferedReader
。 - k5_