std::pair<const int, bool>
这样的键值对时,会出现以下编译错误:
以下是示例代码:In file included from /usr/local/include/c++/6.1.0/utility:70:0,
from /usr/local/include/c++/6.1.0/algorithm:60,
from main.cpp:1:
/usr/local/include/c++/6.1.0/bits/stl_pair.h: In instantiation of 'std::pair<_T1, _T2>& std::pair<_T1, _T2>::operator=(std::pair<_T1, _T2>&&) [with _T1 = const int; _T2 = bool]':
/usr/local/include/c++/6.1.0/bits/stl_algo.h:868:16: required from '_ForwardIterator std::__remove_if(_ForwardIterator, _ForwardIterator, _Predicate) [with _ForwardIterator = std::_List_iterator > _Predicate = __gnu_cxx::__ops::_Iter_pred&)> >]'
/usr/local/include/c++/6.1.0/bits/stl_algo.h:936:30: required from '_FIter std::remove_if(_FIter, _FIter, _Predicate) [with _FIter = std::_List_iterator > _Predicate = main()::&)>]'
main.cpp:17:32: required from here
/usr/local/include/c++/6.1.0/bits/stl_pair.h:319:8: error: assignment of read-only member 'std::pair::first'
first = std::forward(__p.first);
int main()
{
int id = 2;
std::list< std::pair <const int, bool> > l;
l.push_back(std::make_pair(3,true));
l.push_back(std::make_pair(2,false));
l.push_back(std::make_pair(1,true));
l.erase(std::remove_if(l.begin(), l.end(),
[id](std::pair<const int, bool>& e) -> bool {
return e.first == id; }));
for (auto i: l) {
std::cout << i.first << " " << i.second << std::endl;
}
}
我知道(如果我错了请纠正):
I will have exactly the same problem as long as there is constness in any element of the list, for example, a
list <const int>
will also return a compilation error.If I remove the const in the first element of the pair the code will work.
The more elegant and efficient way to do it is by using the remove_if list method, like this:
l.remove_if([id](std::pair<const int, bool>& e) -> bool { return e.first == id; });
但我的问题是,std::remove_if的内部工作方式究竟是什么,它对容器元素不是const的施加了哪些限制?
std::remove_if
要求解引用类型为MoveAssignable,而std::pair<const int, bool>
则不满足此条件。 - user657267